Emily is currently on a 504 Accommodation Plan based on her diagnosis of ADHD. Her plan is reviewed every March, and added to or changed if needed. Her current accommodations are as follows:
-Preferential seating
-Parent/teacher communication as needed
-Reminders to bring home important papers at the end of the day
-Frequent verbal cues prior to giving directions and transitioning
-Rules and expectations should be clear, explicit, and consistently reviewed for understanding
-Small group and alternate site for testing
-Checklists and graphic organizers
-Time lines for longer assignments
-Check agenda and material daily
-Study guides and outlines as needed
I can tell you right now, only some of these are being adhered to. I really don't see it as much of a concern now (although I often wonder how much better she would be doing if she was more organized and together, which would be helped by following the above accommodations) but I am so concerned about next year (middle school) that I am practically having anxiety attacks about it. As it stands right now academically, she is doing well enough to succeed (mostly 3's which is Middleboro means at grade level standard). Could she be doing even better if she was more organized both mentally and physically? I think so. I haven't really worried to much about it because at grade level standard? That's not something to be concerned about really, is it? Unless of course (which my counselor pointed out and I have often thought), she is gifted. Then, at grade level standard might be a concern. What really worries me about next year though, is how much more organized she will need to be (compared to elementary school) just to get by, let alone get to grade level standards or beyond. While I hope some of the needed organization skills will come with maturity, I also know that some of this? It's just the "way she is." Did I mention she has a known abnormality (diagnosed via MRI during the whole Epilepsy diagnosis saga) in the frontal lobe of her brain (the very area which "controls" the so called executive functions of the brain, as well as planning and memory)? So yes, maturity may help, but I question how much it will help.
I feel like I have failed her in a way, not really taking the necessary steps to make sure her 504 plan accommodations are being met. I don't want to be known as "one of those parents" who constantly calls the school, demands services for their child, and in general is just a pain in the ass. Because really? I'm not. Also, authority figures that by the very nature of their job title and/or degree are supposed to know about these things and have a tendency to make you feel inferior, they scare me. Scare the hell out of me if I am being honest. For some reason I live in this world which I think , "If there's a plan in place, they must be following it because well, they're supposed to." After I bang my head on the desk though and come back to reality, I know that while the plan is there, it may not be being enforced and the only way it will be is if I make sure that it is. To that end, not only am I going to take some initiative and meet with the necessary people prior to next year even starting, I am going to request that the following accommodations be added to her existing plan:
-tap on desk or use some other code to bring child back in to focus.
-notify family immediately of any missing or late assignments by phone or email.
-provide Emily with a simple outline and/or notes for lectures.
-allow for expedient make up of late or incorrectly done homework. If deduction for lateness works to the curb problem, keep doing it. If not, recognize the problem as an uncorrectable disability.
-provide an extra set of books for home.
I think the addition of these accommodations, combined with maturity and medication, will really get Emily off on the right foot for the beginning of next year.
Sunday, April 13, 2008
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
Thoughts On MCAS
I have made it well known I believe, here and elsewhere that I oppose MCAS as the single determining factor of a child's graduation from high school. I thought now would be a good time to elaborate further, as I was reminded by Emily that MCAS starts this week.
Decisions about student promotion or graduation should always be based on more information than can be gathered by a single test. Many students will be seriously harmed by this slim definition of what it means to succeed. A few examples:
-students who don't test well but in another setting know how to and can do successfully the material being covered on the test.
-special needs students who can not reach the standards required of other students and are labeled as "failing" despite hard worked for progress they may be making in general.
-transfer students who will not be taught the MA curriculum but will be expected to pass the MCAS to get a diploma.
-students in under-resourced schools who will be punished for something that is not in their control-their larger class sizes and overall lower level of resources available to them.
It seems to me that we are spending millions of dollars on a test that tells us what we already know: schools in our communities are under-resourced and need our help. Our resources should be spent directly on improving schools and classrooms, providing professional development for teachers, and on developing better ways to measure what students are learning. This can not be determined by a standardized, "across the board" test. To assume that it can, is not doing what we as parents and educators should be setting out to do in the first place: providing a well-rounded, multi-faceted program of education which spends more time on the individual student than the student body as a whole.
Decisions about student promotion or graduation should always be based on more information than can be gathered by a single test. Many students will be seriously harmed by this slim definition of what it means to succeed. A few examples:
-students who don't test well but in another setting know how to and can do successfully the material being covered on the test.
-special needs students who can not reach the standards required of other students and are labeled as "failing" despite hard worked for progress they may be making in general.
-transfer students who will not be taught the MA curriculum but will be expected to pass the MCAS to get a diploma.
-students in under-resourced schools who will be punished for something that is not in their control-their larger class sizes and overall lower level of resources available to them.
It seems to me that we are spending millions of dollars on a test that tells us what we already know: schools in our communities are under-resourced and need our help. Our resources should be spent directly on improving schools and classrooms, providing professional development for teachers, and on developing better ways to measure what students are learning. This can not be determined by a standardized, "across the board" test. To assume that it can, is not doing what we as parents and educators should be setting out to do in the first place: providing a well-rounded, multi-faceted program of education which spends more time on the individual student than the student body as a whole.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)